Road Course-survey

[pparker2041]

Should the IRL consider a road course or two on its 2003 schedule?

[Jacoby]

My vote is NO!!

[Indyracin]

I say no too, it'll keep drivers from jumping ship to F1.

[IndyMJH]

No right turns...EVER!!!

[jetdoc]

Originally posted by pparker2041:
<STRONG>Should the IRL consider a road course or two on its 2003 schedule?</STRONG>

IMHO, I don't think it's a matter of if but more of which tracks! If TG's smart, he'll wait to see how many more "defectors" he has next year and then make the decision. If the majority of owners/drivers would like to go "road racing" then I think they should add a couple but NO MORE THAN THREE! We know that the chassis can handle it and the parts that they'd need to put on the car to do it, are all "Bolt on" parts. Dallara told me that it would cost no more than $50,000/car (including the gearbox) to go road racing in these things. I'm an OVAL fan, but would like to see "select/permanent road courses occasionally" just to up the ante a little and force Pook's hand.

[Scrambler]

NO, NO, & NO, :mad: :mad:

Nice Troll

[R_Mears_Fan]

In think throwing in a road-course or two would give it a nice spine, but keep it predominantly oval.

[MicroRacer]

This question has been asked on here a gazillion times and each time my answer has been NO.

Stay the course!

[Tim_racefan]

I'd only want right turns if they were laid out on huge runways, ala Cleveland. That is always one of the great races of the other series.

[stan]

Nope and Nope again. Even if my guy is really hot at road racing.

[Turn7]

Keep Pheonix, Indy, Michigan, Fontana and dump the rest of the ovals for Road and Street races.

[pjc]

NO!

[joe]

I'd like to see no more than 2 like NASCAR. No street courses (well maybe LBGP).

[manson]

**** NO! :mad:

[OutKast]

Not only NO but **** NO!! :mad: