What part of the user agreement did that violate? I'm not saying it didn't - I just don't know. Or was it removed for being in bad taste?
It is the truth and it is part of Indy 500 history.
That accident has been cussed and discussed at length here. Many members have not seen it. For that reason, I think it was appropriate, graphic as it was. I can understand how some would be disturbed by it, but if someone didn't want to view it, they simply had to keep from opening the link.
It is the truth and it is part of Indy 500 history.
That accident has been cussed and discussed at length here. Many members have not seen it. For that reason, I think it was appropriate, graphic as it was. I can understand how some would be disturbed by it, but if someone didn't want to view it, they simply had to keep from opening the link.
Comment