So it appears that Indy cars will start running E85 in 2012, after about a half century of running methanol/ethanol. Despite the fact that it seems to have been lost amid the hype of new engine manufacturers, this seems like it will be a pretty big deal. What all will have to change as far as race tactics (ie fuel stop strategy), pit safety as far as fueling, etc? And all the other detail stuff I can't think of at the moment?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
E85.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sea Fury View PostSo it appears that Indy cars will start running E85 in 2012, after about a half century of running methanol/ethanol. Despite the fact that it seems to have been lost amid the hype of new engine manufacturers, this seems like it will be a pretty big deal. What all will have to change as far as race tactics (ie fuel stop strategy), pit safety as far as fueling, etc? And all the other detail stuff I can't think of at the moment?
porscheman@porscheman121 on Twitter #+200HP!
237.498/241.428/242.333 Speeds from the olden days!
Comment
-
A 35 gallon tank of methanol such as that used from 1997 until Indianapolis 2004 contained roughly two million BTUs of energy.
They then went to 30 gallons of methanol, or 1.72 million BTUs of energy.
This was later reduced to 22 gallons of ethanol, or 1.68 million BTUs of energy.
On E85, to keep that same level of energy, they would be looking at 20.5 gallons of fuel.
35 gallons of E85 would be 2.87 million BTUs of energy, or enough to go 125 miles between pit stops. That would make for a theoretical three stop Indy 500, or a single pit stop in the road/street races.
It would put a premium on tire management and strategy, or teams matching fuel level and tire wear to complete a race in the fastest possible time. Differing strategies would mean guys going forwards and backwards based on tire wear, fuel strategy, handling, etc. so it wouldn't be everybody making stops under yellow and the order not changing.
The tires are good for roughly 100 miles now, so it wouldn't be impossible for Firestone to offer a soft and a hard so there are "80 mile" and "125 mile" tires.
Just a thought."I kill for the code to disarm this mess..."
Comment
-
The last few years we've been running 98% ethanol and 2% gasoline. I don't think a shift to 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline will make a huge difference, especially given that we'll have new engines and a new chassis...just size the fuel tank to get the desired fuel stint length (just like when we went to the current fuel) and you're set.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marc P. Gregoire View PostA 35 gallon tank of methanol such as that used from 1997 until Indianapolis 2004 contained roughly two million BTUs of energy.
They then went to 30 gallons of methanol, or 1.72 million BTUs of energy.
This was later reduced to 22 gallons of ethanol, or 1.68 million BTUs of energy.
On E85, to keep that same level of energy, they would be looking at 20.5 gallons of fuel.
35 gallons of E85 would be 2.87 million BTUs of energy, or enough to go 125 miles between pit stops. That would make for a theoretical three stop Indy 500, or a single pit stop in the road/street races.
It would put a premium on tire management and strategy, or teams matching fuel level and tire wear to complete a race in the fastest possible time. Differing strategies would mean guys going forwards and backwards based on tire wear, fuel strategy, handling, etc. so it wouldn't be everybody making stops under yellow and the order not changing.
The tires are good for roughly 100 miles now, so it wouldn't be impossible for Firestone to offer a soft and a hard so there are "80 mile" and "125 mile" tires.
Just a thought.
Based on your comments about fuel and tire strategy I think they should keep the same fuel cell size.
ThanksYou can be a critical fan without being a Critic... Or can you? Quit your b'tchn and enjoy the racing :D
Comment
-
Originally posted by Indy-hp View PostWhat is the composition of E85? Is that 85% ethanol or 85% gasoline?"Try some of these before or after your statements if you are not presenting them as facts. Things like - "In my opinion", or "I think that", JHMO, IMHO, IMO, JMO... Your opinions are not (necessarily) fact. That would clear things up some." - Seadog 03/25/2010 11:40am So the above is JMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gonzo View PostLike stickman said, 85% ethanol. It is regulated under the food and drug administration. It is actually food grade. It's grain alcohol. They only add the gasoline to prevent people from drinking it. Seriously. 100% ethanol you could suck right out of the pump. The gasoline additive prevents you from doing that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gonzo View PostLike stickman said, 85% ethanol. It is regulated under the food and drug administration. It is actually food grade. It's grain alcohol. They only add the gasoline to prevent people from drinking it. Seriously. 100% ethanol you could suck right out of the pump. The gasoline additive prevents you from doing that.
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment