NASCAR drivers raging over recent repaves
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nascar-...6--nascar.html
This has been going on for a long time, Kansas and Chicagoland were one groove tracks for several years when built. NASCAR seems to not want to look for a solution while using the same old tired ones. Different types of asphalt would be one thing to look into. The second would be diamond grinding the old surface like Indianapolis Motor Speedway has done.
Another thing NASCAR fell in love with was the variable banking. It really hasn't proved effective at very many places. To me because since everybody has the same chassis and engines they all set their cars up the same way and run the same lines. The other thing that doesn't help is ISC and SMI built so many 1.5 mile tracks they all behave the same. And they were all built with higher banking than was needed because it was thought the cars of 1997-2000 needed it. Well now you've got far different cars.
What happened at Kansas is a bigger example of how shortsighted NASCAR is. Several teams had a tire test there weeks before the race. Then after that Goodyear announces they have this multi-compound tire they are going to bring for the race. Well that's not what they tested so that test was a waste of time and all the teams had to figure out the new tire on Thursday.
But NASCAR will never admit they don't have the best answers.
If you can go back and find some tapes of the Milwaukee Mile. Granted it's a flat track After they repaved it the CWTS and NNW tore up the inside groove in the turns on both ends. Well Carl Haas managed to find asphalt to use in those low groves that didn't tear up and is in place to this day. It wouldn't be that tough for NASCAR to find out what he did would it?'
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nascar-...6--nascar.html
This has been going on for a long time, Kansas and Chicagoland were one groove tracks for several years when built. NASCAR seems to not want to look for a solution while using the same old tired ones. Different types of asphalt would be one thing to look into. The second would be diamond grinding the old surface like Indianapolis Motor Speedway has done.
Another thing NASCAR fell in love with was the variable banking. It really hasn't proved effective at very many places. To me because since everybody has the same chassis and engines they all set their cars up the same way and run the same lines. The other thing that doesn't help is ISC and SMI built so many 1.5 mile tracks they all behave the same. And they were all built with higher banking than was needed because it was thought the cars of 1997-2000 needed it. Well now you've got far different cars.
What happened at Kansas is a bigger example of how shortsighted NASCAR is. Several teams had a tire test there weeks before the race. Then after that Goodyear announces they have this multi-compound tire they are going to bring for the race. Well that's not what they tested so that test was a waste of time and all the teams had to figure out the new tire on Thursday.
But NASCAR will never admit they don't have the best answers.
If you can go back and find some tapes of the Milwaukee Mile. Granted it's a flat track After they repaved it the CWTS and NNW tore up the inside groove in the turns on both ends. Well Carl Haas managed to find asphalt to use in those low groves that didn't tear up and is in place to this day. It wouldn't be that tough for NASCAR to find out what he did would it?'
Comment